The Writing Business: Part I

Two days ago I spoke at the Edinburgh International Book Festival (get me!), on the subject of The Writing Business. I’d never done anything like this before, so I was very lucky to share the stage with Keith Charters of Strident Publishing and to have the event chaired by the writer Eric Swanepoel, who was very capable and kind.

After our talk was finished I spent a lovely hour in the company of friends, old and new, some of whom had been kind enough to pay to come and listen to me.  It was sunny, there was wine, and I laughed my geography-teacher shoes off. But I discovered that our event been sold out, and that there had been a queue waiting for returns which sadly didn’t materialise. So I decided to put my notes for the event here, so that those of you who couldn’t get tickets would be able to join in at least virtually.

As usual, though, I’m not doing this to be kind: I’m the biggest beneficiary. Because of time contraints I had to cut my notes by more than two thirds, and this gives me a chance to say all I wanted, without the risk of being driven off the stage by a bored audience who only really came to see Keith. Brilliant!

So here we go. Enjoy the first part of my talk: part two will appear tomorrow, and part three on Sunday. I hope it’s useful, and that it makes sense, and am, as ever, looking forward to your questions.

The Writing Business

1)     This session is all about making the most of your writing: so I’m going to focus on getting published as well as you can, and earning the most from your work.

2)     Let’s consider one of my favourite things: money.

3) QUESTION would anyone like to suggest how much most writers earn?

4)     In 2000, the Society of Authors surveyed its members’ earnings. At that time, the national average annual wage was just under £21,000.

a)     61% of the writers who responded to the survey earned under £10,000 a year.

b)     46% earned under £5,000, of whom 123 said that writing was their main source of income.  14 writers in this group had no other source of income at all.

5)     In 2005 the Authors’ Licensing and Collection Society carried out a similar survey. The mean average reported annual income for writers was £16,531; the median average was just £4,000.

6)     So, how can we, as writers, do better than that? There’s a simple trick. Write a good book; publish it well; sell lots of copies; and do that once or twice a year.

7)     This session isn’t about “writing well”, so let’s think about publishing well.

8) QUESTION: Publishing badly: what’s so bad?

a)     writers can lose money instead of making it;

b)     bad books lurk forever, ready to put readers off other, better titles.

c)     low sales prevent future contracts, because the first thing a publisher will do when considering a new writer is look his previous books up on Nielson Bookscan: if sales were poor, that’s a negative mark against the writer.

9) QUESTION: what do you think “publishing well” involves?

a)     Your book must be of the highest quality in all ways: not just the writing, but also the typesetting, the design, the jacket, and the production.

b)     And it must get in front of your potential readers otherwise they won’t know it’s there. And if they don’t know it’s there, they won’t buy it.

10)   Both those points—high quality and reaching your readers—are very difficult to achieve if you decide to self-publish.

a)     writers very rarely have the knowledge or expertise to produce a beautiful book;

b)     self-publishers don’t have access to the same distribution channels that mainstream, commercial publishers have.

11)   In commercial publishing, distribution is focussed on getting books into as many retail outlets as possible.

12) QUESTION: Why is distribution so important?

a)     Because most books are sold from physical bookshops.

13)  The Bookseller published some research last year which confirmed that most books—about 68% of commercial titles—are sold from real, physical, bookshops, and not online. Of the remaining 32%, a portion are sold from supermarkets and so on, and the rest are sold online—but nearly half of those online sales are only made after selection in a physical shop. [This report is not available online: I'll provide a proper citation for it as soon as possible.]

14)  Very few self-publishers get their books into bookshops nationally and so miss out on at least 68% of their market.

15)  So self-publishers need to find different ways to sell their books. Which is why self-publishing can be an excellent option for good niche titles which have an easily-identifiable and reachable market. This almost always means non-fiction in an area the writer has some expertise and reputation in.

16)  Consequently, self-published fiction very rarely sells in high quantity because fiction is not usually a niche product.

17)  So, if you want your books to sell well your best bet is to get a commercial publisher interested.

18)  If you want to get the bigger publishers interested in your work, you need an agent.

19)  Not only will an agent get your work looked at by the bigger publishing houses, he or she will improve your income.

20)  How much better off are agented writers compared to non-agented ones? They get better contracts and higher advances and these sums almost always outweigh the agents’ fees. These figures from 2005:

a)     The range in unagented advances is from $0 to $15,000

b)     The median unagented advance is $3500 (the average is $4051)

c)     The range in agented advances is from $1500 to $40,000

d)     The median agented advance is $6000 (the average is $7500)

21)  And that’s not all: agents are far better-placed to make foreign sales and sell your subsidiary rights than you are.

22) QUESTION: what are subsidiary rights?

a)     Large print, audio books, e-books, serial rights (newspaper and magazine serialisations) etc.

23)   All foreign sales have subsidiary rights, so this is a rich seam of potential income.

a)     Subsidiary rights sales are lovely. In her talk at this year’s Romantic Novelists Association summer conference, literary agent Carole Blake explained: “You’ve got it; you sell it; you’ve still got it; you sell it again; you’ve still got it; you sell it again!”

24)  I’ve heard of agents making 30 or more deals per title when all foreign and subsidiary rights are counted.

a)     This is exceptional: 5-20 is more usual.

b)     But writers are rarely placed to make those 5-20 sales themselves.

c)     Rights should rest with whoever has the best chance of selling them well—there’s no point hanging onto foreign rights if you can’t sell them and your publisher can.

Apologies for the rogue smiley who keeps on popping up. I could probably evict him if I took a little more time, but this post is already way too late, and he is rather funny.

27 Responses to The Writing Business: Part I
  1. Lynn Price
    August 27, 2010 | 2:42 pm

    Sure wish I could have been there. I would have been the one standing at the back, clapping wildly, cheering, and tossing you chocolate. The beagle would have wormed her way to the front with a frothy fresh margarita.

  2. Lucy Coats
    August 27, 2010 | 3:34 pm

    What a truly excellent talk that must have been, Jane. I also wish I could have been there (and for the raucous afterparty). I’ll look forward to the next installment.
    Lucy @ http://scribblecitycentral.blogspot.com
    PS No smileys popped up in my version. Now I feel hard done by!

  3. Jane Smith
    August 27, 2010 | 3:43 pm

    Thank you, girls! I would have loved to have you both there heckling me: Nicola Morgan promised to, but didn’t say a word.

    The smiley is wearing sunglasses, and appears for me on point number eight: I think it’s the combination of an 8 and an end-parenthesis sign. Let’s see if it works in the comments: 8)

  4. Jane Smith
    August 27, 2010 | 3:46 pm

    Yay! It does! :) ;) 8) P) D) B) O)

    Smileys, in order of appearance (or not) were made by typing the following characters, each one followed by an end-parenthesis )

    : ; 8 P D B O

  5. Eric Swanepoel
    August 27, 2010 | 4:01 pm

    It was great to meet you, Jane. I thought your talk was excellent!

  6. Dan Holloway
    August 27, 2010 | 4:34 pm

    I wish I could have been there too.
    Let me play devil’s advocate for a moment. I’m sure you can imagine what I’d say. The figures are very convincing, but we’re always being told how the publishing landscape is constantly changing, so don’t we need figures that are a lot more up to date than these?

  7. Sarah Callejo
    August 27, 2010 | 6:16 pm

    This is such a detailed and interesting post. I’m going to bookmark it. Thank you so much for taking the time to share it with us.

  8. Jane Smith
    August 27, 2010 | 6:35 pm

    Eric, it was just lovely to meet you. I hope to do it all over again next year.

    Dan, of course more up-to-date stats would be useful: they always are. But the people who keep on insisting that the publishing landscape is changing so radically do tend to be the ones who are outside it and don’t really know what they’re talking about: those five- and ten-year-old statistics are far more reliable than the rhetoric which we’ve both read on the internet over the years.

    Sarah, I’m glad you like this post. I hope the next two in the series are also to your liking.

  9. Dan Holloway
    August 27, 2010 | 6:41 pm

    Jane, I agree entirely – purely playing devil’s advocate because I could just see all those hands waving going “but”. I msut say it doesn’t feel to me that things are changing the way the e-volution brigade would have us believe. I think we’re on the cusp of another cultural underground breaking out moment such as happens every 20 years (Beat, Punk, Grunge…) but I think it has little to do with being driven by eculture (people will use it, but that’s very differnt). I think there are lots of people looking at a new coat of paint and thinking they see a new house, as it were – while the real new houses are being built who knows where

  10. Toni Sands
    August 27, 2010 | 8:25 pm

    So sorry to have missed this, Jane. Hope to do better next year.

  11. alex wilson
    August 27, 2010 | 11:47 pm

    This is good. No nonsense, right to the essence. Love it. Probably better notes than I could have taken from actually listening to your talk. Thanks for doing this.

  12. Jane Smith
    August 28, 2010 | 8:58 am

    Dan, I like your painted house analogy. Thing is, POD and e-readers are changing the business, but then so did printing presses, the end of the net book agreement, and so on. It’s ALWAYS changing; but as you’re very well aware, that doesn’t mean that in two years mainstream publishing will be gone for good, which is what a lot of the less well-informed commentators seem to think.

    Toni! Thank you: I did have a marvellous time in Edinburgh, and so do, of course, wish that you’d been there too, but this way you get MORE information because I didn’t talk about half this stuff. So it’s not so bad. But yes, do come next year (assuming I’m invited back).

    And Alex: thank you. I’m kicking myself now for not telling everyone at the start of my talk that I would put these notes up here. There would have been a lot less frenzied scribbling.

  13. Lesley Cookman
    August 28, 2010 | 10:06 am

    This great, Jane. Especially following the Grudniad piece by Ursula McKenzie yesterday. You both put paid to the doom-mongers, and your point about the uninformed is reinforced by some of the comments on her piece. If that makes sense.

    Look forward to the next two.

  14. DanielB
    August 28, 2010 | 11:20 am

    So sorry I missed this talk! One day I will make it to Edinburgh… OK with you if I link to this on my official Facebook page? (With credit, of course…)

  15. Lev Parikian
    August 28, 2010 | 11:39 am

    That’s excellent stuff Jane. Pithy good sense and useful info. And a recurring groovy smiley to boot. Look forward to the next bits.

  16. Jane Smith
    August 28, 2010 | 12:09 pm

    Lesley, I’m going to have to add a link to that Guardian piece now–thank you for reminding me.

    Dan, of course you’re welcome to link to this piece: part two is now available, and the third part should appear at 10am tomorrow morning. And do come to Edinburgh: I got the gig by totally sucking up to Nicola Morgan, and it worked.

    Lev: thank you. I should have known you’d like the smiley most!

  17. Lesley Cookman
    August 28, 2010 | 12:24 pm

    Pleasure! And in this section of your talk, I would like to add my voice to your advice on Master’s degrees. I took one (which I mentioned when I guest blogged here) run by Worthy Welsh Poets. I gave at least two sessions during the year I was doing the course. They knew NOTHING about commercial publishing. Luckily, I was already published so had contacts in the business. And, of course, I met my publisher!

  18. Jane Smith
    August 28, 2010 | 12:38 pm

    Here’s a link to the Ursula Mackenzie article which appeared in the Guardian yesterday. It attracted a whole raft of ridiculous comment and while I was very tempted to wade in, I doubt that I’d change anyone’s opinions.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/27/digital-era-publishers-not-defunct

  19. Kath
    August 28, 2010 | 1:02 pm

    I had that awful feeling of having missed the party by not being able to get to Edinburgh, so thank you for sharing your talk in this way. And it’s great that we get to read the extended version and can easily share it with others – it’ll make much better sense than any notes I’d have made at the time, had I come along!

  20. Jane Smith
    August 28, 2010 | 3:00 pm

    Kath, thank you! We’ll have to work out a way for everyone to attend, or at least join in the chat afterwards, if I ever do it again.

  21. Kath
    August 29, 2010 | 11:13 am

    @ Jane Smith:We’ll have to work out a way for everyone to attend, or at least join in the chat afterwards, if I ever do it again.

    – Podcast or (interactive) webcast, perhaps?

  22. [...] niche book (if I do say so myself!) that is only for sale in one brick-and-mortar bookshop – where up to 68% of commercial books sales originate – and therefore I think I have a right to be proud of shifting any copies at [...]

  23. [...] The Writing Business: Part 1 [...]

  24. Evan Paul
    February 14, 2011 | 1:22 pm

    The very first trembling step after writing a book is allowing its exposure to the harsh light of critisism. For most of my life I’ve been a storyteller, a poet and an adventurer. Six decades have past me by as I’ve spun out stories, poems and gifts and I have finally finished a lengthy work of literary fiction that has taken me almost three decades to finish. It has just completed its first test by fire in a critical read by a very qualified author in his own right. His comment, “This is the very best novel I have ever read!”

    Thanks for the difficult truth as well as the healthy encouragement. I feel prepared to reap the expected raft of Rejection Notices as well as have that special faith that not all literary agents are living in the rarified stratosphere.

  25. ron blanco
    February 15, 2011 | 11:59 am

    Hello Jane,

    I think your comments on the risks of publishing badly are a sensible warning, which I shall heed.

    I am interested in the statistics you mention in (4) and (5). But, in order for us to gauge the trend from 2000 to 2005 I think you need to clarify the numbers. In particular, what were the mean and median incomes for 2000 and 2005?

    In 2005 the mean and median for SoA members were £16,531 and £4,000 respectively, but what were they in 2000? From 4a and 4b it is possible to estimate that the median for 2000 was somewhere between £5,000 and £10,000, but wouldn’t it be clearer to give the actual figure?

    Also do you know the sample size in 2000, so that the 123 people who regard writing as their main source of income can be placed in context.

    I guess that the conclusion will be that average incomes have come down, but if you have these figures I would find it very helpful. Incidentally are the 2010 figures available yet?

    In any case it is a very informative blog.

    Thanks

    Ron

  26. Jane Smith
    February 16, 2011 | 7:15 am

    Ron, if you follow the links I provided you’ll find my original articles on writers’ earnings; and in those articles there are links to my source material which might answer some of your questions.

    Incidentally are the 2010 figures available yet?

    I’m not aware of anyone studying authors’ earnings in 2010 but if you hear of anyone, let me know.

  27. ron blanco
    February 18, 2011 | 4:13 pm

    Thanks Jane.

    You’re quite right, the link does explain:

    “In the five years from 2000 to 2005, the average reported income for writers dropped from £16,600/£6,333 to £16,531/£4,000″ (for mean/median).

    Although both have gone down, the median appears to have plummeted. I think this means that the income has become more skewed in favour of the top earners. Is that right? Perhaps that is due to the effect of supermarkets and such-like offering great rewards for a small number of best-selling books?

    But a lot seems to have happened since 2005 which is why I think it will be interesting to know the 2010 figures, although it would be surprising to see anything other than a further drop in those income figures.

    Regards

    Ron

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

 

Trackback URL http://howpublishingreallyworks.com/wp-trackback.php?p=3148